Are Clausewitz theory of Friction and Means and Ends relevant to a Research Paper

argon Clausewitz opening of Friction and Means and Ends relevant to a college student today - Research Paper suitIt is important to remember that the fog stems from corrupted information and so, the US officers can get better equal to(p) to see and interpret everything by making advancements in information technologies. This look paper is basically an begin to scrutinize the extent to which the Clausewitzian concepts on struggle can be considered relevant today for college students by exploring what the research literature has to say on the subject. Carl Von Clausewitz served in military army and developed many momentous theories somewhat warfare. Those theories can be found in his epic book On War which was still raw(prenominal) when he died. He has gained more reputation till now as a military theoriser than a military professional. The fact that Clausewitzs work is still frenetically researched demonstrates that it is found relevant charge today in contemporary times. Al so, my opinion is that I appreciate and enjoy Clausewitzs theoretical approaches to war. I believe that he has conveyed what it takes to really understand the phenomenon of war through his insightful theories which can be serviceable to anybody even today in the modern times. According to Clausewitz, war is served by many activities (2008, p. ... In his theory about mover and end, he favors strategy over tactics. His concept of tactics is a confluence of two streams, agent (fighting forces) and ends (victory) suggesting that better trained fighting forces can lead to victory if they are more experience at seeing and processing information on the battlefield. This is because once the means are properly developed, the purposes of the war get clearer, and the desired objectives can be reached without unnecessary delays due to uncertainty (fog). However, in strategy the means is victory and the end is things which can help to reestablish peace. Just victory is not important, reesta blishment of peace should in any case be a desired end. I find Clausewitzs theoretical concepts to be both challenging and acutely insightful because he digs with acute intelligence into a variety of meanings associated with friction and means and ends, and the best part is that every meaning holds something captivating to reflect. Clausewitz holds the position that the rate of probability is especially lavishly in a situation like war because everything is uncertain. Here, he goes against earlier war theorists who attempted to astutely assess the war performance by using hard and fast rules. For this purpose, the earlier theorists concentrated yet on factors which could be calculated like the war supplies, number of participants (soldiers), interior lines etc. They forgot to assess the action of war by considering factors which do not have fixed values and cannot be calculated. It is the work of those theorists which cannot be considered relevant today because the times have changed and there is no room for those inflexible concepts on war now. Clausewitzs work on war in reference to its relevance today